Biased Assimilation

tags
Cognitive Bias

Lord: "Biased assimilation occurs when perceptions of new evidence are interpreted in such a way as to be assimilated into preexisting assumptions and expectation."

There are some strategies for mitigating biased assimilation

Notes on Lord

Biased assimilation occurs when perceptions of new evidence are interpreted in such a way as to be assimilated into preexisting assumptions and expectations

NOTER_PAGE: (1 . 0.30712166172106825)

acting as though one’s assumptions and expectations are correct is generally more adaptive than acting as though one’s assumptions and expectations might be wrong

NOTER_PAGE: (1 . 0.3716617210682493)

college students behaved more negatively toward a graduate assistant merely because they had previously been treated poorly by a different person who happened to wear her hair in the same style

NOTER_PAGE: (2 . 0.12833827893175076)

The ‘halo effect’ is a particularly robust form of over-generalization

NOTER_PAGE: (2 . 0.23219584569732937)

Assumptions and expectations tend to take precedence when there is no actual object to perceive

NOTER_PAGE: (3 . 0.31008902077151335)

The perceptual system relies on assumptions and expectations to make sense of an inherently ambiguous world

NOTER_PAGE: (4 . 0.6364985163204748)

partisans on both sides of the issue accepted the methodological rigor of whichever study had supported their own opinions, and yet found serious flaws in the methodology of whichever study’s results contradicted their own opinions

NOTER_PAGE: (5 . 0.1795252225519288)

the participants reported having adopted even more extreme opinions than they had held before the experiment began

NOTER_PAGE: (5 . 0.24554896142433236)

new evidence can get assimi- lated into preexisting assumptions and expectations and be perceived as supportive even when it is not

NOTER_PAGE: (5 . 0.607566765578635)

People are pragmatists. They are not as concerned with learning the truth about the ‘real’ world as they are with making decisions that will have the least harmful conse- quences if the decision proves wrong

NOTER_PAGE: (6 . 0.07492581602373888)

Assumptions and expectations, which are so readily activated, carry with them a presumption of truth

NOTER_PAGE: (6 . 0.7247774480712167)

When people honestly believe that they are perceiving reality accurately, they are genuinely surprised to learn that other people have been exposed to the same evi- dence and yet arrived at conclusions different from their own

NOTER_PAGE: (7 . 0.6268545994065282)

conclude quite reasonably that people who regard the evidence as neither supporting nor opposing them must be bending over backwards to favor a perspective opposite to their own

NOTER_PAGE: (7 . 0.6958456973293768)

told the experimenter that they feared they might be biased in their evaluations of studies that contradicted their opinions, so they took extra care to be completely fair and unbiased. They claimed to have bent over backwards to give the contradictory study every possible benefit of doubt

NOTER_PAGE: (8 . 0.4910979228486647)

merely exhorting participants to be fair and unbiased might have little or no effect on the tendency toward biased assimilation

NOTER_PAGE: (8 . 0.6060830860534124)

cast themselves in the role of a judge or juror when reading the two death penalty studies. As predicted, these heavy-handed instructions did nothing to alter biased assimilation

NOTER_PAGE: (8 . 0.7796735905044511)

think about what their evaluation of each study’s methodology would have been had they known in advance that the study had produced outcomes

NOTER_PAGE: (8 . 0.8827893175074184)

consider the opposite technique eliminated both biased eval- uations and attitude polarization

NOTER_PAGE: (9 . 0.07863501483679526)

To reduce biased assimilation, it seems sufficient merely to have participants entertain any alternative

NOTER_PAGE: (9 . 0.1261127596439169)

Biased assimilation can be reduced, then, by directing people toward cognitive strategies that they would not likely have discovered or implemented on their own

NOTER_PAGE: (9 . 0.22922848664688428)

People do not display biased assimilation of new evidence when, before encountering that new evidence, they first get an opportunity to portray themselves in very positive ways

NOTER_PAGE: (9 . 0.29525222551928787)

sense of safety that allows them to at least consider alternative possibilities

NOTER_PAGE: (9 . 0.5074183976261127)

Reminds me of SCARF

epistemic and teleologic strategies that have been comprehensively reviewed by Maio & Thomas

NOTER_PAGE: (9 . 0.6416913946587537)