Power to the People? Opportunities and Challenges for Participatory AI

tags
AI Participatory Design

Notes

participation opens the gateway to an inclusive, equitable, robust, responsible and trustworthy AI.

NOTER_PAGE: (1 0.4503664223850766 . 0.28620689655172415)

lack of clarity on what meaningful partici- pation entails and what it is expected to do.

NOTER_PAGE: (1 0.5183211192538308 . 0.22413793103448276)

optimistic vision of AI intended to deeply support human agency and enhance prosperity.

NOTER_PAGE: (1 0.7255163224516988 . 0.5310344827586206)

center the values of inclusion, plurality, collective safety, and ownership,

NOTER_PAGE: (2 0.11259160559626916 . 0.30517241379310345)

self-determination and community empowerment.

NOTER_PAGE: (2 0.1692205196535643 . 0.08362068965517241)

‘participation-washing’

NOTER_PAGE: (2 0.1832111925383078 . 0.30689655172413793)

transparent, accountable, and responsive to the needs of those who participate.

NOTER_PAGE: (2 0.24383744170552965 . 0.5862068965517241)

learn from and include knowledge created by the people directly affected

NOTER_PAGE: (2 0.2698201199200533 . 0.6594827586206896)

traced back to the work of Scandinavian researchers in the 1970s and 80s

NOTER_PAGE: (2 0.4503664223850766 . 0.5525862068965517)

‘workplace democracy’ understood as a system of structured consultation and dialogue between workers and employees with the aim of giving workers greater control over wages and the allocation of tasks.

NOTER_PAGE: (2 0.4770153231179214 . 0.7775862068965517)

asymmetrical power dynamics in society left unchanged.

NOTER_PAGE: (2 0.6875416389073951 . 0.16551724137931034)

range of participatory methods, whether they include Del- phi interviews, citizen’s juries, role-playing exercises and scenarios, workshops, force field analyses, or visual imagery

NOTER_PAGE: (2 0.8254497001998667 . 0.5698275862068966)

mediated participation

NOTER_PAGE: (3 0.1698867421718854 . 0.521551724137931)

notion of par- ticipation played a central role in the administration of the British empire.

NOTER_PAGE: (3 0.18254497001998668 . 0.11982758620689656)

agency and intentionality

NOTER_PAGE: (3 0.22451698867421718 . 0.5517241379310345)

colonial projects claimed their legitimacy under the veneer of participation.

NOTER_PAGE: (3 0.2691538974017322 . 0.19224137931034482)

shift away from logic-based AI systems towards more data-driven paradigms such Deep Learning [48] as well as new infrastructure for capturing and leveraging human-generated data (e.g. Amazon Mturk) prompted greater demand for “non-expert” participation

NOTER_PAGE: (3 0.41905396402398404 . 0.7603448275862069)

participation without redistribution of power is an empty and frustrating process

NOTER_PAGE: (3 0.48900732844770156 . 0.2508620689655172)

ImageNet [22], where the research team utilized over 49,000 workers from Amazon’s mechanical turk (Mturk)

NOTER_PAGE: (3 0.5143237841439041 . 0.7362068965517241)

abuses and concentration of these forms of “Ghost Work" in low income countries and peoples

NOTER_PAGE: (3 0.748834110592938 . 0.6172413793103448)

industry stakeholders calling for greater par- ticipation without resolving these tensions has led to concerns of ‘participation-washing’

NOTER_PAGE: (4 0.28114590273151235 . 0.20862068965517241)

Reciprocity, Reflexivity, and Empowerment,

NOTER_PAGE: (4 0.5049966688874084 . 0.14741379310344827)

By not sharing their data, the Māori argue they are able to maintaining their autonomy and right to self-determination.

NOTER_PAGE: (5 0.11403508771929825 . 0.79333838001514)

foregrounding reciprocity and refusal

NOTER_PAGE: (5 0.5508771929824562 . 0.6805450416351249)

the research, datasets and tools may be co-opted and monopolized by commer- cial actors to improve products or models without supporting the broader grassroots effort or the community’s interests or needs. As a result the primary beneficiaries of participatory data sourcing may not be speakers of ‘low-resourced’ languages but actors with access to such sufficient data and compute resources, thus gaining financial benefits, control and legitimacy off of such participatory efforts.

NOTER_PAGE: (5 0.5538011695906433 . 0.12414837244511734)

Māori com- munity had to explicitly prevent corporate entities from getting hold of the dataset. The community thus established the Māori Data Sovereignty Protocols

NOTER_PAGE: (5 0.8198830409356725 . 0.19530658591975775)

participation as a form of algorithmic perfor- mance and/or dataset quality improvement.

NOTER_PAGE: (6 0.1298245614035088 . 0.2210446631339894)

participants are assigned pre-defined roles and very clear tasks.

NOTER_PAGE: (6 0.26783625730994154 . 0.17486752460257382)

this form of participation focuses on fine-grained activities that come with pre-defined goals and objec- tives means that there is little room (if at all any) for co-exploring, co-creating, and/or negotiating the larger objectives, reflections, and implication of AI systems.

NOTER_PAGE: (6 0.32222222222222224 . 0.26419379258137776)

Concerns remain of participation becoming a mechanism of cooptation.

NOTER_PAGE: (6 0.4210526315789474 . 0.6252838758516276)

net harm to the targeted regardless of their improved perfor- mance.

NOTER_PAGE: (6 0.4608187134502924 . 0.1165783497350492)

difficult to measure and provide attribution to the positive benefits of participation.

NOTER_PAGE: (6 0.6526315789473685 . 0.7168811506434519)

I think this is not really a problem if you do it right. If people have the ability to stop participating, but they continue, then you know it's working well enough.

participation is not the best mechanism for decisions/values/norms that are better decided and codified by democratic institutions, governance and laws.

NOTER_PAGE: (6 0.7649122807017544 . 0.2157456472369417)

require stronger forms of validation and legitimacy [32]. Participatory activities convened by private actors or parallel institutions, cannot stand in for democratic politics,

NOTER_PAGE: (6 0.8643274853801169 . 0.3890991672975019)