Charging for Justice

tags

HiiL

Notes

need outcomes in people’s lives to be clearly defined, so that they can be targeted and measured

NOTER_PAGE: (5 . 0.4657387580299786)

people are willing to pay for preventing or resolving justice problems, either as taxpayers or as a fee for service. Effective interventions that bring peace of mind and repair their relationships are valuable to them

NOTER_PAGE: (5 . 0.5406852248394005)

increasing contributions by beneficiaries and government agencies for effective services, whilst decreasing general subsidies

NOTER_PAGE: (6 . 0.3661670235546039)

Regulatory space

NOTER_PAGE: (6 . 0.5032119914346895)

evidence-based, scalable and financially sustainable

NOTER_PAGE: (6 . 0.6413276231263384)

local delivery

NOTER_PAGE: (6 . 0.734475374732334)

basic technologies

NOTER_PAGE: (6 . 0.8394004282655246)

The world is behind in providing access to civil justice and criminal justice.

NOTER_PAGE: (8 . 0.7601713062098502)

many crimes go unreported

NOTER_PAGE: (8 . 0.866167023554604)

Promising approaches

NOTER_PAGE: (12 . 0.17987152034261242)

existing knowledge and technology. We do not have to wait for AI or blockchain to deliver justice to all

NOTER_PAGE: (13 . 0.21306209850107066)

revenues from people centred justice services need to increase very substantially

NOTER_PAGE: (13 . 0.7173447537473234)

chain of command and accountability system for the justice sector is very complex

NOTER_PAGE: (16 . 0.7055674518201285)

Performance-based budgeting

NOTER_PAGE: (19 . 0.26017130620985013)

increased budgets for courts are not correlated with greater output

NOTER_PAGE: (22 . 0.39186295503211993)

number of judges and court personnel per population are not, per se, key determinants of the quality of service

NOTER_PAGE: (23 . 0.4197002141327623)

trend towards centralising and scaling courts is not improving performance

NOTER_PAGE: (23 . 0.6563169164882228)

number of courts is generally not a major determinant of the quality of service

NOTER_PAGE: (23 . 0.8361884368308352)

legal aid costs are strongly correlated with the complexity of procedures and with the use of adversarial models of conflict resolution

NOTER_PAGE: (24 . 0.4464668094218416)

faster judgments do not lead to higher appeal rates

NOTER_PAGE: (24 . 0.7762312633832977)

Studies on the effects of introducing technology suggest that these effects are ambiguous

NOTER_PAGE: (26 . 0.5235546038543898)

public understands the inefficiencies in the justice system

NOTER_PAGE: (26 . 0.6927194860813705)

Helping more citizens to live peacefully side-by-side creates more work, without options to increase revenues.

NOTER_PAGE: (27 . 0.5695931477516061)

online service model or a dense network of houses of justice, subsidies for such services will compete with the budgets of police, prosecution, courts and the ministry

NOTER_PAGE: (27 . 0.8137044967880086)

Focus performance indicators on ultimate outcomes (impact) for the population

NOTER_PAGE: (28 . 0.6873661670235547)

private justice sector provides helpful services, and benefits from the inefficiencies of courts and public justice institutions

NOTER_PAGE: (37 . 0.418859649122807)

Litigation and arbitration services have lower or negative net benefits

NOTER_PAGE: (39 . 0.44188596491228066)

Only 2.8 % of the 2018 and 2019 investments are going to services directly oriented toward individual people struggling with legal problems

NOTER_PAGE: (45 . 0.6019736842105263)