Heidegger discusses instrumental rationality, although of course he doesn't call it that, because he's such a special little boy and he has to use his own names for things
NOTER_PAGE: (3 . 0.4869072894550602)
NOTER_PAGE: (3 . 0.7317763623496107)
NOTER_PAGE: (4 . 0.1967445152158528)
NOTER_PAGE: (4 . 0.8067940552016986)
NOTER_PAGE: (5 . 0.21939136588818117)
NOTER_PAGE: (5 . 0.7098372257607927)
NOTER_PAGE: (6 . 0.34253361641896674)
NOTER_PAGE: (6 . 0.5173389950460014)
what on earth are you talking about. these nations are all enormous social constructs, nothing like the "simple fact" that someone made art
NOTER_PAGE: (6 . 0.6871903750884643)
NOTER_PAGE: (8 . 0.16772823779193208)
NOTER_PAGE: (9 . 0.48973814578910124)
NOTER_PAGE: (10 . 0.5152158527954707)
NOTER_PAGE: (10 . 0.7565463552724699)
NOTER_PAGE: (13 . 0.2208067940552017)
Is there no techne at the core of humanity?
NOTER_PAGE: (14 . 0.4900990099009901)
recalls the Sioux's Great Mysterious that Vine Deloria, Jr. speaks of
NOTER_PAGE: (14 . 0.7107496463932108)
NOTER_PAGE: (15 . 0.3177636234961076)
foolish idea. i hate this guy
NOTER_PAGE: (15 . 0.5145081387119604)
can't be that essential if it's so easy to lose