NOTER_PAGE: (1 . 0.28314238952536824)
NOTER_PAGE: (1 . 0.2855973813420622)
NOTER_PAGE: (1 . 0.7430441898527005)
NOTER_PAGE: (2 . 0.06546644844517185)
this actually doesn't strike me as shocking as the author might want. quite normal in CS for the implementation of a language or library to be extremely compact and elegant, consuming applications sprawling and messy. perhaps similar in law
NOTER_PAGE: (2 . 0.5130932896890344)
NOTER_PAGE: (2 . 0.8780687397708675)
rudimentary? seems to do quite well
NOTER_PAGE: (3 . 0.1342062193126023)
NOTER_PAGE: (3 . 0.48527004909983634)
NOTER_PAGE: (3 . 0.5065466448445172)
NOTER_PAGE: (5 . 0.6587561374795418)
NOTER_PAGE: (5 . 0.8019639934533552)
NOTER_PAGE: (6 . 0.2945990180032733)
NOTER_PAGE: (6 . 0.3158756137479542)
NOTER_PAGE: (6 . 0.48199672667757776)
NOTER_PAGE: (6 . 0.8657937806873978)
NOTER_PAGE: (6 . 0.8829787234042553)
NOTER_PAGE: (7 . 0.17348608837970542)
NOTER_PAGE: (7 . 0.19312602291325698)
NOTER_PAGE: (7 . 0.3027823240589198)
NOTER_PAGE: (7 . 0.5180032733224222)
s m D h, mike