Troubling Patterns in Canadian Refugee Adjudication

tags
Access to Justice

Notes

outcomes in refugee adjudication appear to hinge, at least in part, on the identity of the adjudicator

NOTER_PAGE: (2 . 0.46811702925731435)
NOTER_PAGE: (20 . 0.14962406015037594)

there appears to be greater cohesiveness in the decisions of judges of the same gender than in those from the same party of appointment

NOTER_PAGE: (20 . 0.40902255639097745)

some adjudicators see their role as giving effect to Canada's international human rights obligations

NOTER_PAGE: (22 . 0.17142857142857143)

Other Board Members, however, reportedly see their role as protecting the integrity of Canadian border control processes

NOTER_PAGE: (22 . 0.27593984962406015)

when the government brought the new legislation into force in 2002, it selectively implemented the legislation. In particular, all of the provisions of the legislation were brought into force except those pertaining to the RAD. Successive governments have continued to indefinitely delay the implementation of the RAD

NOTER_PAGE: (26 . 0.4992481203007519)

State of Exception