NOTER_PAGE: (1 . 0.3007092198581561)
NOTER_PAGE: (1 . 0.8673758865248228)
:PROPERTIES:
:NOTER_PAGE: (2 . 0.2936170212765958)
::END:
NOTER_PAGE: (2 . 0.7382978723404255)
NOTER_PAGE: (4 . 0.3787234042553192)
NOTER_PAGE: (4 . 0.39574468085106385)
NOTER_PAGE: (5 . 0.3970276008492569)
NOTER_PAGE: (7 . 0.11134751773049646)
NOTER_PAGE: (7 . 0.8262411347517731)
NOTER_PAGE: (9 . 0.2539007092198582)
NOTER_PAGE: (9 . 0.6198581560283688)
NOTER_PAGE: (17 . 0.5390070921985816)
NOTER_PAGE: (17 . 0.5609929078014185)
reminds me of a recently read critique of design thinking
NOTER_PAGE: (17 . 0.7872340425531915)
NOTER_PAGE: (18 . 0.15390070921985816)
NOTER_PAGE: (18 . 0.7390070921985816)
NOTER_PAGE: (20 . 0.824822695035461)
NOTER_PAGE: (21 . 0.19007092198581563)
NOTER_PAGE: (25 . 0.25815602836879437)
NOTER_PAGE: (26 . 0.599290780141844)
NOTER_PAGE: (27 . 0.13049645390070924)
NOTER_PAGE: (27 . 0.19361702127659575)
NOTER_PAGE: (27 . 0.29574468085106387)
NOTER_PAGE: (27 . 0.6787234042553192)
NOTER_PAGE: (27 . 0.8)
NOTER_PAGE: (29 . 0.13546099290780142)
NOTER_PAGE: (29 . 0.6617021276595745)
NOTER_PAGE: (32 . 0.11276595744680852)
would love some expansion on this. are we rejecting empiricism as a basis for science?
NOTER_PAGE: (32 . 0.5184397163120568)
NOTER_PAGE: (33 . 0.2936170212765958)
NOTER_PAGE: (33 . 0.49716312056737594)