NOTER_PAGE: (1 . 0.4675130694548171)
NOTER_PAGE: (1 . 0.7012696041822256)
NOTER_PAGE: (6 . 0.42793129200896196)
NOTER_PAGE: (8 . 0.3368185212845407)
NOTER_PAGE: (8 . 0.6631814787154593)
NOTER_PAGE: (9 . 0.20985810306198657)
NOTER_PAGE: (10 . 0.409260642270351)
Very Code and Other Laws
NOTER_PAGE: (13 . 0.6430171769977596)
Mark: cf "boundaries of successful policies are inevitably set by the buoyancy of the economy"
NOTER_PAGE: (15 . 0.438386855862584)
NOTER_PAGE: (15 . 0.8547904191616768)
NOTER_PAGE: (17 . 0.520537714712472)
NOTER_PAGE: (20 . 0.38909634055265124)
NOTER_PAGE: (21 . 0.3719193427931292)
NOTER_PAGE: (22 . 0.4973861090365945)
NOTER_PAGE: (24 . 0.5884988797610157)
NOTER_PAGE: (25 . 0.5586258401792383)
NOTER_PAGE: (25 . 0.6430171769977596)
NOTER_PAGE: (26 . 0.5168035847647499)
NOTER_PAGE: (27 . 0.2434652725914862)
I think I've read somewhere a paper disagreeing with this and showing that it's theoretically possible, for a certain definition of "economy", to get infinite growth from finite resources
NOTER_PAGE: (28 . 0.2270351008215086)
NOTER_PAGE: (28 . 0.37042569081404036)
NOTER_PAGE: (31 . 0.20911127707244215)
NOTER_PAGE: (34 . 0.3009708737864078)
NOTER_PAGE: (36 . 0.22554144884241972)
NOTER_PAGE: (37 . 0.26736370425690814)
NOTER_PAGE: (38 . 0.5705750560119492)